The term "differently abled"; is not recommended by the social model for disability

The term "differently abled" is not recommended by the social model of disability, as it may perpetuate negative stigmas surrounding individuals with impairments. Below are some reasons why the social model discourages referring to individuals with impairments as "differently abled":

1. The term can imply or reinforce the idea that individuals with impairments are incapable of certain aspects of being human, which can be harmful to their self-esteem. In reality, people with impairments do not need to demonstrate all their abilities to be acknowledged; everyone has different abilities.

2. It can place undue emphasis on what the person cannot do, rather than focusing on their strengths and capabilities. Society should not pressure people with impairments to constantly prove their competencies but should provide the necessary reasonable accommodations to help them reach their full potential.

   
   

3. It creates a distinction between people, rather than promoting equality and inclusion.

   
   

4. It makes "being different" the defining characteristic of the individual, instead of recognizing them as a whole person with specific needs that should be accommodated.

   
   

5. It adds an unnecessary label. The social model refers to two groups:

   1. Persons with impairments

   2. Persons with disabilities.

      
      

6. It can be perceived as condescending, implying that individuals with impairments need special treatment. The social model seeks to move away from the idea of "specialness" and instead views them as individuals with specific needs who are entitled to reasonable accommodations.

   
   

7. The term may divert attention from addressing real issues such as accessibility, equity, and the challenges related to discrimination. Disability is imposed by society.

While it is important to respect individual preferences regarding terminology, we must be mindful of using concepts that promote inclusivity, accessibility, and equal opportunities, rather than those that may contribute to otherness and exclusivity. Individuals with impairments are not inherently different; their needs are simply different.

Sources:

The South African White Paper on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2015)

The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2006)