Why do we support person-first terminology?

Disability is not inherent to the person with an impairment. Rather, the Social Model of Disability views it as a social construct imposed by society on persons with impairments. This concept is evolving. It emphasizes that attitudes and physical environments exclude and marginalize persons with impairments. We cannot allow something that excludes us to become our identity.

Person-first terminology prioritizes the individual over their disability (imposed by society), emphasizing humanity and dignity.

Why Person-First Terminology?

1. Respect and dignity: Person-first language acknowledges a person's identity beyond their disability, promoting respect and dignity.

2. Reduces stigma: By placing the person first, we shift the focus from disability to the individual, reducing stigma and stereotypes.

3. Emphasizes capabilities: Person-first language highlights a person's abilities and strengths, rather than limitations.

4. Inclusive and respectful: This terminology is widely accepted and recommended by disability organizations and advocates, ensuring inclusion and respect.

   
   

Why not Disability-First Terminology?

1. Reduces person to disability: Disability-first language can perpetuate the notion that a person is defined solely by their disability.

2. Perpetuates stigma: This terminology can reinforce negative stereotypes and stigma surrounding disabilities.

3. Overlooks individuality: Disability-first language can overlook a person's unique experiences, strengths, and identities beyond disability.

Examples of Person-First Terminology

• Person with a disability (instead of "disabled person")

• Person who uses a wheelchair (instead of "wheelchair-bound person")

• Person with a visual impairment (instead of "blind person")

• Person with a hearing impairment (instead of "hearing-impaired person")

By using person-first terminology, we promote a culture of respect, inclusion, and dignity for individuals with impairments.

The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, South African disability legislation, the White Paper, and Codes on Disability, as well as the Social Model of Disability, all recommend person-first terminology.

So, why do we support person-first terminology? We simply support our conventions, policies, and legislation.